At dinner last night a friend's comment about "being right and being ignored" reminded me
(somehow) of this conversation between Cass Sunstein and Tyler Cowen
In particular,
COWEN: Now, your new book On Liberalism is primarily a defense
of the liberal concept, but if someone asks you, what’s the most likely
scenario for liberalism being self-undermining, what’s your worry?
SUNSTEIN: Low probability. The likelihood is that we’ll be undermined
by anti-liberal and illiberal forces, not self-undermining. I
think it’s fair to
say or to worry that liberalism doesn’t create the conditions for its own
self-perpetuation, so it’s not as if it’s self-undermining, but it doesn’t
necessarily maintain itself [emphasis added]. The reason is that a society that is
flourishing
needs a lot of stuff in it, including norms of cooperation, norms
of charity,
norms of mutual support. Liberalism, in my view, doesn’t undermine
those things, but other forces can undermine them, and it’s not clear
liberalism has the resources to respond.
Given the times we are in, I do very much worry about our not having
the resources to respond.
I enjoy the "Conversations with Tyler" podcast. The participants mostly
assume you know what they know and, since I don't, this results in me very often
pausing the audio and searching for a primer on what was just
said.